April 30th, 2014
I support a strong universal public healthcare system - but I do not support the violation of basic rights, including the right to make a medical decision for oneself (in conjunction with ones doctors) that the operation of the Canada Health Act ultimately leads to. In 2010, I was an expectant first time mother. I had made a medical decision in conjunction with my doctors to give birth by way of cesarean, for a variety of personal reasons. It is not a decision that is "publicly favourable". As a result when it came time for my daughter to be born, my surgery was bumped, and ultimately I went into labour. There was, allegedly, no anesthesiologist available. My daughter was delivered vaginally against my express wishes for my medical care. Her birth continues to haunt me. I was lucky to find compassionate care and appropriate access to timely care for the birth of my son 2 years later - but women who choose cesarean in Canada continue to be violated by a system that places a priority on what the public wants regardless of the impact on individuals. I tried to sue for the failure to provide timely access to medical care - but ultimately the risks and costs of litigation made it impossible. This lawsuit is not the greatest threat to Medicare today - the greatest threat to medicare today is the assumption that the prohibition on private care somehow strengthens the public system.
In order to add comments please make sure javascript is enabled.